Re: Implementable Set Theory ... AHA !!!



On 15 Okt., 11:28, tommy1729 <tommy1...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
hagman wrote:
To show inconsistance, you need to show that *no*
model can exist that
implements all your axioms, or more easily: that
you
can prove a
sentence
and its negation.

aha ! to show inconsistance you need to prove a
sentence and its negation !!!

remember the animals in the room ?

Do you mean Schrodinger's cat?


no dammed , i even GAVE THE LINK AND TOPIC !

both alive or dead (negation of alive) was said to
be true,

'dead' and 'alive' are themselves awfully unspecific
properties.
And anyway you are referring to quantum physics where
they are not opposites but rather something like
orthogonal waveforms (well, a bit more comlex than
that),
which allow superposition.


i am NOT REFERRING TO QM ( bogus )


yet

HERE YOU SAY THAT IMPLIES INCONSISTANCE !!

I was implicitly referrnig to mathematical theories,
esp. those based on predicate calculus, where
(P & ~P) -> Q
is a theorem.


so the animals paradox is inconsistant or hold no
info, just as my recent topic said !


http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=1638026

"logic and paradox: more on TST and the liar
paradox"


SEE THIS ; the link !!



regards
tommy1729

ps i dont consider hagman an enemy or something ,
just pointing out the paradoxal reasoning of cantor
set theory.
afterall a proof must be consistant with all math
theories.



tommy1729
.



Relevant Pages

  • Implementable Set Theory ... AHA !!!
    ... to show inconsistance you need to prove a sentence and its negation!!! ... HERE YOU SAY THAT IMPLIES INCONSISTANCE!! ... so the animals paradox is inconsistant or hold no info, just as my recent topic said! ... ps i dont consider hagman an enemy or something, just pointing out the paradoxal reasoning of cantor set theory. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Implementable Set Theory ... AHA !!!
    ... to show inconsistance you need to prove a sentence and its negation!!! ... HERE YOU SAY THAT IMPLIES INCONSISTANCE!! ... I was implicitly referrnig to mathematical theories, ... so the animals paradox is inconsistant or hold no info, just as my recent topic said! ...
    (sci.math)