Rationals subset of reals?
- From: dwwdkddb <kimfierens@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:42:15 EDT
When constructing the real numbers R from the rational numbers Q, is it really formally legitimate to say that Q is a subset of R? I have strong doubts about this, because R is usually defined in terms of equivalence classes of sets of rational numbers. So what's meant by the symbol Q actually? The set of rational numbers themselves (i.e., certain equivalence classes of pairs of integers) or the subset of R which corresponds to these rational numbers?
Thanks very much in advance.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rationals subset of reals?
- From: hagman
- Re: Rationals subset of reals?
- From: Denis Feldmann
- Re: Rationals subset of reals?
- From: David W . Cantrell
- Re: Rationals subset of reals?
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: Rationals subset of reals?
- Prev by Date: solutions manual of "Elements of Information Theory (2rd)"
- Next by Date: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Previous by thread: solutions manual of "Elements of Information Theory (2rd)"
- Next by thread: Re: Rationals subset of reals?
- Index(es):