Re: Typo, I hope.
- From: quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:30:42 -0400
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:10:07 -0700, "achsofromm@xxxxxxxxx"
<dkw12002@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My daughter is taking prealgebra and one problem...different from all
the others shows a sequence of 25, 44, 53, 62...and asks for the 12th
term. My daughter had 19n + 6 = t, and that looks right, but only for
the first two terms. Then the sequence seems to be 9n+35. This was
likely a typo since every other problem on the work*** and the
example showed consistent increases with simple relationships...unless
I am missing something. Is there just one formula to describe the
above sequence or is it likely a mistake? Now I don't really know what
to do since the 12th term using 9n+35 is different from using 19n+6.
Any ideas? Thanks, dkw
Yes, given the context (prealgebra, linear expressions), it
essentially a certainty that it's a typo, just as you expected.
Thus, assume the first term should have been 35, not 25.
The formula 9n + 35 then works perfectly, but be careful -- the first
term uses n = 0, so you need to use n = 11, not n = 12, to get the
12th term.
quasi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Typo, I hope.
- From: achsofromm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Typo, I hope.
- References:
- Typo, I hope.
- From: achsofromm@xxxxxxxxx
- Typo, I hope.
- Prev by Date: Re: PDE question: when does "separation of variables" work?
- Next by Date: can someone show me how to do this
- Previous by thread: Typo, I hope.
- Next by thread: Re: Typo, I hope.
- Index(es):