Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:47:19 +0200
Jesse F. Hughes wrote:
Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
lwalke3@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Notice that if T is a theory and phi is any
axiom, then if M is a model of T+phi, then
M is a model of T. In other words, any model
of a theory is a model of any subtheory.
ZF-Infinity is a subtheory of ZF, since the
former is a subset of the latter. And so any
model of ZF is a model of ZF-Infinity.
Yes. And a "model" of (ZF-Infinity) is not per se a model of ZFC, which
is the very difference between an "if" and an "iff".
Everyone else seems to know the difference between "if" and "iff".
But you wrote the following:
It's impossible to have infinity without Infinity. If not, show us
such a model, please.
What on earth did you mean, if not: Show us a model of ZF - Infinity
with infinite sets in the model?
Yeah, just do it! Surprise me!
Han de Bruijn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Mike Terry
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- References:
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: hagman
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: lwalke3
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Prev by Date: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Next by Date: Re: substring of irrational
- Previous by thread: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Next by thread: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading