Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC

Jesse F. Hughes wrote:

Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Jesse F. Hughes wrote:

Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

It appears that the confusion stems from mainstream mathematics failure
to distinguish a childish model from any serious implementation, once
again. Look, my Implementable Set Theory e.g. is covering all Database
Applications on Earth, which is .. a billion dollar business!

Wow!
I could ask what "covering all Database Applications" is supposed to
mean, but that would be presumptuous. After all, you're the guy with
a billion dollar implementation of set theory! I got doodlysquat.

Of course, as a philosopher, you have no idea what Database Applications
are all about. And what set theory has to do with them.

Educate me. How does your toy set theory contribute to database
applications?

My "toy set theory" includes all set theory that is needed to build any
database applications. But it's nothing new in that respect.

Han de Bruijn

.

Relevant Pages