Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes <wpihughes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:53:31 -0700
On Oct 24, 5:45 am, wangyong <hell...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
The probability distribution of the plaintext has no relationship at
all to the possible values of the cyphertext or their probabilities.
How can any
observation of the cyphertext provide any information about the
probability distribution of the plaintext?
- William Hughes
iit It is the conditonion that ciphertext as a fixed
value.
The paper has state thaet view
There is no connection between the probablity distribution
on the plaintext and that on the cyphertext. Thus, knowing the
value of the cyphertext does not tell us anything about the
distribution of the plaintext.
- William Hughes
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Confirmation of Shannon’s Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon’s Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Confirmation of Shannon’s Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Prev by Date: Re: question on rings
- Next by Date: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Previous by thread: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Next by thread: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|