Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC

David C. Ullrich wrote:

Saying he's wrong does not prove that he is. Your "proof" that 5-8
follow from 1-4 is simply not a correct proof - that's a fact, independent of anything anyone may have said here.

Yes, you've declared that repeadedly, by _dogma_. Are you the Pope of
Mathematics or what? Or is it true that I'm not allowed to enter the
Sacred Rites of you and your companions?

Han de Bruijn

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
    ... Han de Bruijn writes: ... follow from 1-4 is simply not a correct proof - that's a fact, ... Mathematics or what? ... Claiming that Ullrich is being dogmatic when he has repeatedly ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Alan Turings Halting Problem is incorrectly formed
    ... >Okay, There does not exist Water ice as 6,000 degrees. ... because it has nothing to do with mathematics.) ... >> David C. Ullrich ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Surely Youre Joking, Mr. Ullrich !
    ... book "Complex Made Simple" by David C. Ullrich. ...   bility 1. ... Another kind of "counter intuitive" mathematics again ?? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Surely Youre Joking, Mr. Ullrich !
    ... book "Complex Made Simple" by David C. Ullrich. ... Another kind of "counter intuitive" mathematics again ?? ... though for you it seems to be mandarin chinese mixed with totonaca and ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Impossible sampling theory!
    ... David C. Ullrich wrote: ... >>One of my professors implied that the Dirac delta wasn't mathematically ... > There's no problem with the mathematics involved in the delta ...
    (sci.math)
Loading