Re: Two results of set geometry

David R Tribble wrote:
Tony Orlow wrote:
If each is the last plus 1, then the nth is n, and there cannot be n of
them without n being in the set. That's basic logic. No non-logical (ala
Ross) axioms required. It's pre-axiomatic, and therefore has precedence.

I see at least three axioms being used there. Do you?

Hint: What does "n plus 1" mean?


Hint: It doesn't matter, if the size and max of the set start out equal, and have "+1" simultaneously applied. x+1=x+1 by simple identity. Do it y times, and x+y=x+y. I don't need any axioms to note that the same string is on both sides of the equal sign.

Smiles,

Tony
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Two results of set geometry
    ... Tony Orlow wrote: ... No non-logical (ala ... Ross) axioms required. ... It's pre-axiomatic, and therefore has precedence. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Ross/Brand/Sachs
    ... Hint: that was fiction. ... Ross and Brand calling Andrew Sachs was real life. ...
    (uk.media.tv.misc)
  • Re: CMYK to RGB conversion
    ... Thanks for the hint - that looks like a good place to start figuring ... Ross ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.powerpoint)