Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes <wpihughes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 09:24:40 -0700
On Oct 28, 9:50 am, wangyong <hell...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
When only considering C=0 and the cryptosystem
(regardless of the prior probability of plaintext),
we can educe that the plaintexts are equally likely
Are you now admitting this statement is false?
================================When only considering C=0 and the
cryptosystem
(regardless of the prior probability of plaintext),
can you see the precondition?
You have agreed
A: No observation on the cyphertext gives you
any information about the probablility distribution
on the plaintext,
Even when not considering a prior probability
on the plaintext ("regardless of the prior
probability of plaintext") the observation of the
value of the cyphertext tells you nothing about
the probability distribution on the plaintext.
In particular, you cannot "educe that the plaintexts
are equally likely"
- William Hughes
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Confirmation of Shannon’s Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon’s Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Confirmation of Shannon’s Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Prev by Date: Re: is it a measure?
- Next by Date: Volume computation of a convex polyhedron
- Previous by thread: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Next by thread: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|