Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:37:13 +0100
Virgil wrote:
In article <728b6$4720895d$82a1e228$26020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David C. Ullrich wrote:
Saying he's wrong does not prove that he is. Your "proof" that 5-8
follow from 1-4 is simply not a correct proof - that's a fact, independent of anything anyone may have said here.
Yes, you've declared that repeadedly, by _dogma_. Are you the Pope of
Mathematics or what? Or is it true that I'm not allowed to enter the
Sacred Rites of you and your companions?
You are allowed in, but only when you provide mathematically valid proofs of your claims.
David has said that as far as he can tell, 5-8 seem to follow from 1-4 in your model, but not necessarily in every model.
In my patient response to Moeblee, I've argued that my model is in fact
"every model". It's essentially independent of the suggested bitmapping.
As you only investigate the one model, this does not constitute a mathematically sound proof that in every 1-4 model one must also have 5-8.
Han de Bruijn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- References:
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Virgil
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Prev by Date: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Next by Date: Sum(n=1,inf, sin (1/n)) Help?
- Previous by thread: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Next by thread: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|