Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:49:21 -0700
On Oct 31, 4:13 am, Han de Bruijn <Han.deBru...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So, even if I don't make use of (5-8), a proof of A from (1-4) is a
proof from (1-8) ? So, even if I say "there exists a Foo", then such
a statement is a valid premise for proving that the integral of 1/t
from 1 to x is ln(x) ? Weird ..
No one said anything about "valid premise".
Here is the definition (I'm giving it a bit informally, it be can be
made even more precise, but this is good enough for our purposes),
and, for convenience, I'll use Hilbert style proof (it's easy to adapt
this to other systems such as natural deduction):
P is a proof of S from G iff
P is a sequence of formulas in the language such that every entry in
the sequence is either an axiom of logic (with identity if identity
theory is used or needed) or a member of G or follows from previous
entries in the sequence by an inference rule, and the last entry in
the sequence is S.
Then
Theorem: If P is a proof of S from G, and G is a subset of H, then P
is a proof S from H.
Proof:
Suppose P is a proof of S from G, and G is a subset of H.
Then P is a sequence of formulas in the language such that every entry
in the sequence is either an axiom of logic (with identity if identity
theory is used or needed) or a member of H (SINCE EVERY MEMBER OF G IS
A MEMBER OF H) or follows from previous entries in the sequence by an
inference rule, and the last entry in the sequence is S.
Do you get it now?
MoeBlee
.
- References:
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Prev by Date: Re: Third dimension...
- Next by Date: Re: Irrational number from an infinite sum
- Previous by thread: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Next by thread: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|