Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:50:04 -0700
On Oct 31, 6:22 am, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here's my statement of ~Infinity:
Every set has a finite number of members. In other words, every set
can be put in one-to-one correspondence with some set {0,1,...,n}.
Or 1-1 with the empty set.
But I don't know how to derive that as an equivalent of the axiom of
infinity, where the axiom of infinity is Ex(0ex & Anex nu{n) e x).
I see that, in Z-I, "every set is 1-1 with a natural number" entails
the negation of the axiom of infinity. But how, in Z-I, do you derive
"every set is 1-1 with a natural number" from the negation of the
axiom of infinity?
MoeBlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- References:
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Virgil
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Prev by Date: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Next by Date: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Previous by thread: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Next by thread: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|