Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC

From: Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:28:37 -0600

In article <c488f$4728977f$82a1e228$4409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

So what's wrong with concluding that (1)-(4) also
entail ~Infinity?

The above & the axiom of Infinity is more complicated than my intuitive
understanding of it.

Han de Bruijn

HdB should avoid trying to dictate truths about things that even he
confesses he does not understand.
.

Prev by Date: Re: Ellipse Distance / Intersection
Next by Date: Solutions Manuals
Previous by thread: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
Next by thread: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: The modern mathematical concept of infinity is indefensible
... Han de Bruijn wrote: ... infinity accurately: ... Only where did the immense Intelligence come from? ...
(sci.math)
Re: Another Inconvenient Truth
... Han de Bruijn wrote: ... I don't even know what infinity ... what does an abstract mathematical problem have ...
(sci.math)
Re: -- Wrong limits do not commute
... Han de Bruijn writes: ... infinity, that might give you some value g. ... differently, e.g. along a ray with a fixed slope, you know, that the ...
(sci.math)
Re: The modern mathematical concept of infinity is indefensible
... Han de Bruijn wrote: ... Han de Bruijn wrote: ... What was the temperature of the Universe just before the Big Bang? ... actual infinity, as HdB does, then the existence of singularities MUST ...
(sci.math)
Re: Cantor, trolls, infinite and stuff
... Han de Bruijn wrote: ... It's impossible to measure infinity. ... Our dear HdB decides to go Bozo the Clown once again: ...
(sci.math)