Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC



On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:03:34 +0100, Han de Bruijn
<Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

MoeBlee wrote:

On Oct 31, 1:59 am, Han de Bruijn <Han.deBru...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jesse F. Hughes wrote:

I will say it once more. I am typing this slowly, since I don't want
you to miss anything I say. If you have a proof in a theory
consisting of axioms (1)-(4), it is also a proof in the theory
consisting of axioms (1)-(4)+(X).

How do you "know" that? Has the Pope told you, by dogma, that it is so?

No, you royal ignoramus, it's PROVEN as a basic property of the
deductive system. It's the property of monotonicity of deduction. And
we PROVE it.

Yeah, yeah. Then why are (5-9) required in ZFC, once Infinity has become
an axiom of it? Why is e.g. Choice provable in (ZFC-Infinity) and not in
common ZFC?

This has been explained several times. If by ZFC-Infinity you mean
ZFC without the axiom of infinity then Choice is _not_ provable
in that syatem. "ZFC without the axiom of infinity" is not the
same as "ZFC plus the negation of the axiom of infinity" - choice
_is_ provable in ZFC plus the negation of the axiom of infinity.

But ZFC does not consist of "ZFC plus the negation of Infinity"
plus more axioms (it _is_ equal to "ZFC withot Infinity" plus
more axioms).

Han de Bruijn


************************

David C. Ullrich
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Iteration square root of arcsinh
    ... It's clear that the axiom of Infinity ... is the only ZFC axiom which is not implementable. ... I'm not trying to call HdB a so-called "crank," nor ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Aleph One Sets
    ... [George Greene] ... beyond what can be proved in ZFC alone. ... one axiom you like best. ... When I included a rather long quote from Woodin in my last reply, ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: GCH vs. Axiom of Choice.
    ... |separation is vacuous or it has content. ... seem related to the axiom of separation? ... |insisting that the power set contains all the subsets and that all ... In the language of ZFC, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
    ... ZFC without the axiom of infinity then Choice is _not_ provable ... _is_ provable in ZFC plus the negation of the axiom of infinity. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Why Regularity?
    ... "Naive comprehension is the principle that, ... this set theory is not heading at a Russell set as ZFC does. ... I think if I add this axiom, then I will currenty that is a set ... The axiom is inconsistent all by itself. ...
    (sci.math)