Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:09:08 +0100
David C. Ullrich wrote:
But ZFC does not consist of "ZFC plus the negation of Infinity"
plus more axioms (it _is_ equal to "ZFC without Infinity" plus
more axioms).
Let's add to it the response by Jesse F. Hughes, and see if that might
lead to something that resembles agreement between us.
[ ... ] It seems to me that your model contains every set required
by axioms (1)-(4) and no sets that are not required and so it is
apparently minimal. If I were to hazard a guess, I would say that
there is a model homomorphism mapping your model into any other model
of (1)-(4). I would further guess that this homomorphism is
one-to-one.
What do you think?
Han de Bruijn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: hagman
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Virgil
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- References:
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Prev by Date: Re: 2000 availables Solutions manual
- Next by Date: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Previous by thread: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Next by thread: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|