Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 13:20:33 -0700
In article <6eb5b$472ed3ba$82a1e228$6770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Marshall wrote:
2) ZFC, without Infinity.
3) ZFC, with the negation of Infinity.
Is it clear why 2) and 3) are different?
Not to me. I don't know what Foo is and I don't know what ~Foo is.
Han de Bruijn
Then you are in no position to criticize those who do.
.
- References:
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Marshall
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Prev by Date: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Next by Date: Re: Modern Algebra questions
- Previous by thread: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Next by thread: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|