Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:42:07 -0700
In article <b3c4e$47304704$82a1e228$6480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Virgil wrote:
In which case (negation of axiom of infinity unprovable) how does HdB
come to be so certain that the axiom of infinity must be false in IST?
Can you imagine a machine where it is implemented in?
I am not a mechanic. My 'models' of mathematical objects, however much
they may have been suggested by the physical world, have no need of any
non-mental mechanisms to justify their existence.
That those with less flexible imaginations are more limited is not my
problem.
.
- References:
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Marshall
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Virgil
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple Algebra Question 3^x + 5^x = 8
- Next by Date: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Previous by thread: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Next by thread: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|