Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes <wpihughes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:26:37 -0800
On Nov 6, 7:49 pm, wangyong <hell...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
how can you use the condition c is fixed to compute, it is not a
value,
Agreed. The condition "c is fixed" is not a value. C has
two possible values. So you have to compute the probablity
distributions twice. You assume that the value
of C is fixed. You then calculate the probablity
distributions for one possible value of C assuming the value of
C is fixed. You then calculate the probability distributions for the
other
possible value of C assuming the value of C is fixed.
In both case you find that the probability distribution on M is
unchanged.
You get two different probability distributions for K, but neither is
uniform.
- William Hughes
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Prev by Date: Re: Cosets of invertible matrices
- Next by Date: Re: A quote (and question) about intuitionism
- Previous by thread: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Next by thread: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|