Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes <wpihughes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:13:31 -0800
On Nov 6, 11:08 pm, wangyong <hell...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
how you can compute, how can you find the probability M not changed.
do not just the the result ,that is useless.
Compute the joint probability of M, K and C
(use the known probability distribtuions of M and K
the fact that M and K are independent, and the formula
for getting C from M and K)
Assume C fixed. Two cases.
For each case note the value of C and compute
the conditional probability of M using the known
joint probability of M, K and C and the definition
of conditional probability.
In both cases you get the same probability
distribution for M
- William Hughes >
- -
a change in form but not in content,you just use the probability when
c is not fixed.
No. I do not use the probability when
c is not fixed. I compute the conditional probability. This
can be computed from the joint probability, but
is not the same as the unconditional probability
(the probability when c is not fixed).
- William Hughes
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Prev by Date: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Next by Date: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Previous by thread: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Next by thread: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|