Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong <hellowy@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:33:03 -0800
On 11 7 , 4 23 , William Hughes <wpihug...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 7, 12:09 am, wangyong <hell...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
-----------a change in form but not in content,you just use the
probability when
c is not fixed.
you use the the joint probability of M,K and C when c is not fixed.
I use the joint probability distribution of M,K and C.
a change in form but not in content
but the the joint probability of M,K and C is not the same when c is
fixed as when c is not fixed.
There is no such thing as the joint probability distribution of
M,K and C when c is fixed.
- William Hughes
how you get the probability???
when c fixed, if we soppose k uniform, then m uniform
if we suppose m as its prior, then k is corronspand as prior.
Indeed we dont know the probability of M and k when c fixed, you just
use the case c is not fixed.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- References:
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Prev by Date: Re: Is a line segment composed of points?
- Next by Date: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Previous by thread: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Next by thread: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|