Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes <wpihughes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:57:23 -0800
On Nov 7, 3:38 am, wangyong <hell...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11 7 , 4 23 , William Hughes <wpihug...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 7, 12:09 am, wangyong <hell...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
-----------a change in form but not in content,you just use the
probability when
c is not fixed.
you use the the joint probability of M,K and C when c is not fixed.
I use the joint probability distribution of M,K and C.
a change in form but not in content
but the the joint probability of M,K and C is not the same when c is
fixed as when c is not fixed.
There is no such thing as the joint probability distribution of
M,K and C when c is fixed.
- William Hughes
what you do is fixe the prior probability of m ,then use it to decide
the probability of c when k is uniform , then reverse understand the
probability of M.
The case is not random decided by the c fixed and k uniform.
The probability of m is decided by the prior.that is similar to
circular proof.
The proof "If the prior probability of M is not uniform then
the prior probability of M is not uniform" is circular. This
is not however the proof I am giving.
The proof "If the prior probability of M is not uniform then
the probability distribution on K is not uniform for a fixed C"
is not circular.
- William Hughes
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Prev by Date: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Next by Date: Cross product issue
- Previous by thread: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Next by thread: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|