Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong <hellowy@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 06:15:21 -0800
On 11 7 , 8 53 , William Hughes <wpihug...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 7, 7:38 am, wangyong <hell...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
i consider C fixed, k uniform, regardless P prior
This assumption is only correct if
P is uniform.
So any conclusion you draw from this
assumption will be correct only if
P is uniform.
If P is not unform, the conclusion that
P is uniform is incorrect.
So there is no contradiction between
the incorrect conclusion that P
is uniform and the fact that P
is not uniform.
- William Hughes
i consider C fixed, k uniform, regardless P prior
This assumption is only correct if
P is uniform.
====it is This assumption to get the result that
P is uniform.
So any conclusion you draw from this
assumption will be correct only if
P is uniform.
==i just get P is uniform
If P is not unform, the conclusion that
P is uniform is incorrect.
So there is no contradiction between
the incorrect conclusion that P
is uniform and the fact that P
is not uniform.
==========they are obvious contradiction.
I just get that under my precondition, I use the probability under
imperfect conditions to compromise.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- References:
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Prev by Date: Re: Proving a sequence of lLebesgue lntegrals converges
- Next by Date: Re: Clairaut Equation
- Previous by thread: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Next by thread: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|