Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes <wpihughes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 05:55:06 -0800
On Nov 8, 3:01 am, wangyong <hell...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11 8 , 9 44 , William Hughes <wpihug...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 7, 8:31 pm, wangyong <hell...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11 7 , 11 45 , William Hughes <wpihug...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 7, 10:15 am, wangyong <hell...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11 7 , 8 53 , William Hughes <wpihug...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 7, 7:38 am, wangyong <hell...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
i consider C fixed, k uniform, regardless P prior
This assumption is only correct if
P is uniform.
So any conclusion you draw from this
assumption will be correct only if
P is uniform.
If P is not unform, the conclusion that
P is uniform is incorrect.
So there is no contradiction between
the incorrect conclusion that P
is uniform and the fact that P
is not uniform.
- William Hughes
i consider C fixed, k uniform, regardless P prior
This assumption is only correct if
P is uniform.
====it is This assumption to get the result that
P is uniform.
An assumption that "get[s] the result" that
P is uniform is only correct if P is uniform.
If P is not uniform the assumption is incorrect.
So any conclusion you draw from this==i just get P is uniform
assumption will be correct only if
P is uniform.
And this is only correct if P is uniform.
If P is not unform, the conclusion that
P is uniform is incorrect.
So there is no contradiction between
the incorrect conclusion that P
is uniform and the fact that P
is not uniform.
==========they are obvious contradiction.
No
An *incorrect* conclusion that P is uniform
does not contradict the fact the P is not uniform.
- William Hughes
- -
- -- -
- -
<snip evasion>
My comment was that
there is no contradiction between
the incorrect conclusion that P
is uniform and the fact that P
is not uniform.
Your reply was
they are obvious contradiction
Do you continue to maintain this position?
- William Hughes- -
- -
<snip getting closer>
You have still not answered the question.
Let's try step by step.Consider a
proposition A which is always true.
Is there a contradiction between
An incorrect conclusion that A is false
and
The fact that A is true.
- William Hughes
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- From: wangyong
- Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Prev by Date: Re: How is it possible at all? (number/complexity theoretical question)
- Next by Date: Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
- Previous by thread: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Next by thread: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|