Re: Randomness of digits within pi
- From: jonas.thornvall@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 04:00:31 -0800
On 9 Nov, 12:53, "George Marsaglia" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<jonas.thornv...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1194606172.590463.231420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 9 Nov, 11:53, jankri...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 9 Nov, 11:41, jonas.thornv...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
When i was playing around at "http://zenwerx.com/pi.phplooking" for
occurences of my personalnumber within PI i noticed that 333333 and
especially 666666 do not seem to occur as frequent as
111111,222222,444444,555555,777777,888888,999999 or XXXXXX (without
testing all ;)
Is this just a fluke result of to small sample size at the page, could
anyone verify searching in the big file with a program?
If that really the case that 333333 andd 666666 is a lot less frequent
what is the mathematical reason?
J
If there are 4 million digits, that's a sample size that is far too
small to say anything about the frequency of 111111 and the others.
Each of them should only turn up once in one million digits on
average.
---
J K Hauglandhttp://home.no.net/zamunda
Yes i thought the downloadable sample file was bigger but i can see it
is same size now.
But what is known about the distribution of larger digits
(numberstrings?) within pi, is it really randomed distributed?
So i try again is six digit numbers randomly distributed within pi, if
not why?
J
The pdf article
interstat.statjournals.net/YEAR/2005/articles/0510005.pdf
describes results from a number of tests on the randomness
of the digits of pi, as well as e, sqrt(2) and the decimal
expansions of various rationals.
A related article,
interstat.statjournals.net/YEAR/2006/articles/0601001.pdf
refutes claims from Physicists at Purdue that the digits
of pi are not as random as those from other sources.
George Marsaglia- Dölj citerad text -
- Visa citerad text -
Maybe but for sure it is an interesting fact that two strings of
"7777777" turns up in just a sample of 4 million and that "666666"
only occur one time in 4 million digits.
Of course it does not say anything about the big picture, but i can
see while people studying pi historical did find 7 to be a lucky
number and 6 not that lucky.
J
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Randomness of digits within pi
- From: G.E. Ivey
- Re: Randomness of digits within pi
- References:
- Randomness of digits within pi
- From: jonas . thornvall
- Re: Randomness of digits within pi
- From: jankrihau
- Re: Randomness of digits within pi
- From: jonas . thornvall
- Re: Randomness of digits within pi
- From: George Marsaglia
- Randomness of digits within pi
- Prev by Date: Re: Randomness of digits within pi
- Next by Date: Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad
- Previous by thread: Re: Randomness of digits within pi
- Next by thread: Re: Randomness of digits within pi
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|