Re: Fermat's Last Theorem
- From: quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 12:46:39 -0500
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 10:48:15 EST, bassam king karzeddin
<bassam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 10, 7:12 am, bassam king karzeddin
<bas...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Allmore generalized form of FLT conjecture, but it may
The following conjecture may be considered as a
much easier to prove, Do you know why?
Thank Youthen the following integer equation doesn't have any
If (X & Y) are two odd coprime positive integers,
solution in all integer numbers
integers
Z^P = X^P + Y^P + 2*N*X*Y*Z
Where (P) is odd prime number, (Z & N) are positive
above form
**Note that there are many generalizations to the
karzed...@xxxxxxxxx
Best of luck
Bassam Karzeddin
Al-Hussein Bin Talal University
JORDAN
For E-mail insert (.) between b &
Let x = 19, y = 21, z = 52, p = 3, n = 3.
Marcus.
Nice, May be I have forgotten to add that (N is prime to P) necessary condition
I will verify and come back with more explanations since it is too old in my head
Here's a counterexample where n is relatively prime to p:
x = 1, y = 7, z = 172, p = 3, n = 2113
quasi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fermat's Last Theorem
- From: Roman B. Binder
- Re: Fermat's Last Theorem
- From: Tonico
- Re: Fermat's Last Theorem
- References:
- Re: Fermat's Last Theorem
- From: marcus_b
- Re: Fermat's Last Theorem
- From: bassam king karzeddin
- Re: Fermat's Last Theorem
- Prev by Date: Re: Randomness of digits within pi
- Next by Date: Re: monomorphism in the colimit
- Previous by thread: Re: Fermat's Last Theorem
- Next by thread: Re: Fermat's Last Theorem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|