Re: 1^2 =3, Discovered

so, why the obfuscation?... anyway,
not having really tried to analyze this "theorem,"
it seems to be quite trivial, possibly akin
to various old identities with skware & trilateral numbers & so on.

that is, Why?, the "higher arithmetic" is in the quadrivium!

Natural Number Isosceles Triple Theorem:
"Every natural number is a base of an isosceles triplet, whose total sum is square of the base(the number)."
Hence,
1 is (1, 1, 1) = (1 + 1 + 1) = 3 = 1^2

2 is (2, 1, 1) = (2 + 1 + 1) = 4 = 2^2

3 is (3, 3, 3) = (3 + 3 + 3) = 9 = 3^2

4 is (4, 6, 6) = (4 + 6 + 6) =16 = 4^2 . . .

Such that,
n^2 = 2(n^2 - n)/2 + n
Where n, is any possible natural number as can be seen above. -Aiya-Oba.

thus:
what's that "law" about the occurence of more 1s than 9s (and so on)
in tables of logarithms e.g.?... fractions & powers of pi, gamma
of pi etc. must also have this "nornmal" property; really,
why should they *not* have it, and be abnormal?

Up to 800 million decimals after the point, I got a distribution of:
0s: 79991897
1s: 79997003
2s: 80003316
3s: 79989651
4s: 80016073
5s: 79996120
6s: 80004148
7s: 79995109
8s: 80002933
9s: 80003750

I think Marsaglia's "Monkey tests" are at least as good. But the first
billion digits of pi passed the "Monkey tests"....

thus:
if you cannot get Shakespeare, you don't get English,
yet. all of my sentences parse grammatically, syntactically,
logically & even spellingly, in spite of your pro-hominem.

*** Cheeny is in charge of the Darfur policy,
which would be the 3rd British invasion of "the" Sudan
(that is the calling-card of all ivyleague-ed Sudanese folks, but
maybe also a common Sudanese usage).

Is this English? I recognize most of the words... but
at the sentence level it all comes crashing down.

A word about your hearsay about Her Upness, below,
from another forum. Also, if you really want to know,
what the Harry Potter PSs and the Tory and Labor media have
misstated for decades, you can look 'er "up"
in Burke's Peerage. That's an annual book. Very expensive!

I mean, who do you think got us into Iraq, both times?...
Hey, George; let's you and Saddam fight!


thus:
that's Princeton for you-all, and the Ivy League *ad vomitorium*.

anyway, I generally include mathematical stuff
of interest, such as my challenge to B*z*
to actually prove the pythagorean theorem -- and
I want every one of you to do it for *both* forms
of the spatial PT; so, there.

if you don't, woe ... and Whoah --
no navigational duties for you, tonight!

--The Lyyn Cheeny Factor: 25 Hours til the campus jihad!
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2007/071107impeach_momentum.html
http://www.9-11commission.gov/hearings/hearing12/leidig_statement.pdf
(more circumstantial BS; sorry, but they didn't have a link
to the "rest of the story")


thus:
"pancake collapse" and all other putative muzlim fiziks is immaterial;
everyone saw the massive impact & explosion,
unlike any prior trashfire in a tall building, or
the say-so of one contractor that it could withstand several such attacks.

look; the plane was almost as wide as the building.

unfortunately, there was virtually no asbestos cladding
on the main beams, because of the asbestos hoax being launched,
just after the start of construction. such refractant
might have kept the steel from getting weak enough to collapse
(it did not have to "melt," as stated
vy the MIT welder's analysis).

thus:
perhaps, the ordinary aircraft black box,
is just a 4-gimbalthingy plus a harddisk.

--I don't Yahoo(tm)s!... welcome to the googolplex;
youcanlogoutanytimeyoulikebut, Sir Rupert has your face in his space.

.