Re: Confirmation of Shannon's Mistake about Perfect Secrecy of One-time-pad



On 11月11日, 下午8时12分, William Hughes <wpihug...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 10, 10:14 pm, wangyong <hell...@xxxxxxx> wrote:





On 11 10 , 12 17 , William Hughes <wpihug...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Nov 9, 10:22 pm, wangyong <hell...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On 11 9 , 11 41 , William Hughes <wpihug...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A has nothing whatsoever to do with any
problem or precondition we have considered.
It is simply a true proposition. Take
A to be the proposition 1=1.

Is there a contradiction between

An incorrect conclusion that 1=1 is false

and

The fact that 1=1 is true.

- William Hughes- -

- -

how can you justify what is wrong and right.

==== there is a contradiction between

1=1 is false
and
1=1 is true.

they cannot coexist
====An incorrect conclusion that 1=1 is false
and
The fact that 1=1 is true.
=======they are just with the same meaning,not contradiction.

Ok. We have now established that
if A is a true statement
you do not think there is a contradiction
between

An incorrect conclusion that A is false
and
The fact that A is true.

Now, in our example the statement,
"M is not uniform" is a true
statement.

Thus, there is no contradiction
between

an incorrect conclusion that M is uniform

and

the fact that M is not uniform

Recall. My caim is

there is no contradiction between

the incorrect conclusion that P is uniform
and
the fact that P is not uniform.

Your claim is that there is an obvious contradiction.

So, is your claim that

"M is not uniform" and "P is not uniform"
mean different things.

"P is not uniform" is not a true statement.

- William Hughes- -

- -

M is P.
"P is not uniform" is not a true statement.----=========do you meam "P
is uniform" is .

Not very clear. Try Yes or No.

"M is not uniform" and "P is not uniform"
mean different things.

Yes or No?

"P is not uniform" is not a true statement.

Yes or No?

- William Hughes- 隐藏被引用文字 -

- 显示引用的文字 -

no



uncertainty if no condtion,but not yes or no, you are sophism by no
condition.


you just repeat asking, but far away from the problem .it is
outrageous to temporize



.



Relevant Pages


Quantcast