Re: Could a tetration function exist?
- From: mike3 <mike4ty4@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:19:50 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 24, 8:31 pm, lwal...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Nov 24, 1:17 pm, mike3 <mike4...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Another question I had was this. The domain in which
the infinite power tower ^oo x converges on the reals
is between e^(-e) and e^(1/e), inclusive. But what
about on the complex numbers?
So then it would seem that ^4 b would be very
close to zero, as an analysis with Euler's formula
would suggest: The real part gives a value for the
log of the magnitude of the complex number. Since
the log is a giant negative number, the magnitude
must be incredibly close to zero (too close to write
down even if you had a billion billion billion
trillion trillion trillion universes with all their
matter turned to pens, ink, and paper.). This
suggests the sequence actually converges, but only
after swinging up to a silly huge number. Does this
mean tetration converges on the whole complex plane
except for the part of the real line outside
[e^(-e), e^(1/e)]?
Another tetration expert, Daniel Geisler, has already
considered this question:
http://www.tetration.org/Fractals/Atlas/index.html
"The mastery of tetration requires the application of the
theoretical to the explaination of the empirical. The goal
of this atlas is to catalog the major structures of the
tetration fractal. The most interesting features are a
esult of ^n x taking very small or large values where x is
a real number, typically a negative real number and n is
a whole number. The nature of tetration is such that
usually if ^n z has an extremely large magnitude then
often a small value of epsilon can be found such that
^(n-1)(z+epsilon) ~ -^(n-1)z forcing ^n(z+epsilon) to a
ery small value and giving ^(n+1)(z+epsilon) ~ 1 and
^(n+2)(z+epsilon) ~ z+epsilon."
You have discovered that the tetration of 6 + 4i is
eventually 5-periodic. Geisler has graphed a fractal
showing the regions where tetration is n-periodic, for
various values of n ("tetration by period"). Here where
n=1, the tetration actually converges. He also shows the
region where it fails to converge ("tetration by escape").
So I guess this isn't all that new, then. <sigh>
But I'm curious. What are those strange "finger" things in
the fractal?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Could a tetration function exist?
- From: I.N. Galidakis
- Re: Could a tetration function exist?
- References:
- Could a tetration function exist?
- From: mike3
- Re: Could a tetration function exist?
- From: G. A. Edgar
- Re: Could a tetration function exist?
- From: lwalke3
- Re: Could a tetration function exist?
- From: Gottfried Helms
- Re: Could a tetration function exist?
- From: mike3
- Re: Could a tetration function exist?
- From: lwalke3
- Could a tetration function exist?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- Next by Date: Re: Algebra with root and Z_2[x].
- Previous by thread: Re: Could a tetration function exist?
- Next by thread: Re: Could a tetration function exist?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|