Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- From: mike3 <mike4ty4@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:09:17 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 26, 10:13 am, Marshall <marshall.spi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 25, 11:21 pm, Venkat Reddy <vred...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That's most balanced response to my posts I have ever seen. Thanks.
We should not be surprised to see an ignoramus applaud a
proposal that all people are on equal intellectual footing.
Marshall
Acutally, what's more important is not "intellectual"
footing, what's more important is that people not be
_dis_respected.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- From: Marshall
- Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- References:
- Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- From: mike3
- Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- From: mike3
- Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- From: Angus Rodgers
- Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- From: Marshall
- Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- Prev by Date: Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- Next by Date: Re: Non-hausdorff linear topology on R^n
- Previous by thread: Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- Next by thread: Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- Index(es):