Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- From: mike3 <mike4ty4@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:59:02 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 27, 11:04 am, Venkat Reddy <vred...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 27, 10:27 pm, "porky_pig...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <porky_pig...@my-
deja.com> wrote:
On Nov 26, 10:34 pm, Venkat Reddy <vred...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would say any branch of mathematics (topology etc) which desires to
model physical continuum and depends on the notion of "open and closed
intervals of continuum" needs clean up.
What do you know about topology and its methods? Pretty much nothing,
as your post clearly indicates.
No, the obesrvation is not about topology, but about the mathematical
intervals and their modeling of physical continuum.
How good a model they are of the *physical* continuum
says nothing about how good they are as mathematics.
.
- References:
- Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- From: porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- Prev by Date: Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- Next by Date: college physics volume 2 serway faughn
- Previous by thread: Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- Next by thread: Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
