Re: OT: apartness
- From: galathaea <galathaea@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:19:55 -0800 (PST)
it is weird that my comments
are the point where this thread is labelled off-topic
though my actual attempt to contribute meaning to the thread
is not even commented on
and somehow mention of a classical liberal philosophy
is suggestive of orwellian government control
?
understand these things:
- i do not desire that anyone should be prevented from posting
and i desire that every newshost can
filter any target for any reason it desires
(sporge, advert, "wrong" race, bad smell)
i think this has been demonstrated to be a very healthy system
- i mentioned the paper at
http://www.numdam.org/numdam-bin/fitem?id=CM_1968__20__194_0
i was very earnest in pointing this work out
it is freely available
weyl wrote an entire book on the continuum
but this might be more at the accepted level of this discussion
http://publish.uwo.ca/~jbell/Hermann%20Weyl.pdf
it is very clear to me
marshall
that it is those who haven't studied the actual theory deeply
that like to make fun of the stupidity of those
making legitimate but ill-founded claims
it is very clear to me
that they don't even realise
the shallowness of their own positions
i do appear to have been wrong about mike3
although a past of aggressions on various cranks and truthers
and earlier participation here
he has made some disarming statements
that has revealed you to have the even greater desire
you marshall
who are still quite convinced that crank is a useful concept
who mention some of my suggested contributions
are unknown to you
you are angered by what you see as ignorance
you are angered by a lack of deep thinking about the issue
you are angered by what history has revealed to a person
you are angered at their naivete
i hope you never have children
that anger is anger at everyone's condition
at the human condition
at the animal condition
the thinking entity evolves from ignorance
and it has been my experience
that this anger immanentised in the mocking replies
only does harm
it will go a few rounds with someone "winning"
by finding someone that they really can convince their peers
they are smarter than
and then a legitimate position gets knocked down in the process
and everyone loses
and they don't even know it
i am much more of an anarchist than you seem to appreciate
post whatever you desire
but understand though you may think
you are pointing out someone else's ignorance
you are often pointing out your own
and i am free to point that out
anytime i think it might be healthy to
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
galathaea: prankster, fablist, magician, liar
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: apartness
- From: Marshall
- Re: OT: apartness
- References:
- Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- From: galathaea
- Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- From: Marshall
- apartness
- From: galathaea
- Re: apartness
- From: Marshall
- Re: apartness
- From: galathaea
- OT: apartness
- From: Marshall
- Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- Prev by Date: Re: college algebra
- Next by Date: Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: apartness
- Next by thread: Re: OT: apartness
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|