Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:32:01 -0600
mike3 wrote:
On Nov 27, 2:47 pm, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
<step...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
While the mathematics will probably need to be completely reinvented one
day, I don't think that now is the time.
Even if someone does find a legitimate problem now? Although
Venkat Reddy doesn't seem like that someone.
You'd just blow it off? Even if it's 100% valid?
I'm not sure what you are saying here. What is "it"?
If "it" is current mathematics, the answer, of course, is "no." Current mathematics has proven itself extremely effective at getting very good ideas about reality, and presumably for most common calculations it would still be heavily used. When I say "completely reinvented" I am talking about the logical foundations, not the methodology.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
- Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- References:
- Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
- Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- From: mike3
- Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- Prev by Date: Re: a question on normal distribution
- Next by Date: Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- Previous by thread: Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- Next by thread: Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|