Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- From: Denis Feldmann <denis.feldmann.asupprimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 06:47:23 +0100
mike3 a écrit :
On Nov 27, 2:47 pm, Stephen Montgomery-SmithHow would you know it is 100% valid? Do you realize this stuff has been studied, checked and rechecked for hundreds (not to mention thousands) of years by some of the most brillant minds of humanity ? Do you really believe it will (or even could) be some day destroyed by one post at sci.math ?
<step...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
While the mathematics will probably need to be completely reinvented one
day, I don't think that now is the time.
Even if someone does find a legitimate problem now? Although
Venkat Reddy doesn't seem like that someone.
You'd just blow it off? Even if it's 100% valid?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- From: lwalke3
- Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- References:
- Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
- Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- From: mike3
- Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- Prev by Date: Re: Why real numbers and points can't model continuum
- Next by Date: DP problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- Next by thread: Re: Delusions and occasional bleak truth
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|