Re: R^R = R^2 = R



On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:47:14 +0000 (UTC), Dave Seaman
<dseaman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


[...] ZF, which is the set theory that I and most others are using.

Not so sure about that. I'd guess that many mathematicians just use ZFC
without making a fuss. (Of course, in many cases a weaker axiom than CH
would do, still...) No?


F.

--

E-mail: info<at>simple-line<dot>de
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: R^R = R^2 = R
    ... which is the set theory that I and most others are using. ... I'd guess that many mathematicians just use ZFC ... in many cases a weaker axiom than CH ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: R^R = R^2 = R
    ... which is the set theory that I and most others are using. ... I'd guess that many mathematicians just use ZFC ... in many cases a weaker axiom than AC ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: R^R = R^2 = R
    ... Ooops, a typo/thinko... ... which is the set theory that I and most others are using. ... I'd guess that many mathematicians just use ZFC ... in many cases a weaker axiom than ... ...
    (sci.math)
  • Dividing by Zero and Axiomatic Set Theory
    ... infinity - but doing so is generally viewed by mathematicians as ... reality, abstracted from it, which is chosen by mathematicians to serve ... the barber is an adult male. ... a well-behaved portion of naive set theory was ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
    ... The property that I defined as "random" is a property of some infinite ... While we can't say for sure that "obeys a probability distribution" is ... > set theory to think about all that; and mathematicians didn't wait for ... > Hence it seems reasonnable to wonder whether set theory his intuitive ...
    (sci.math)

Loading