Re: How Do I Invert These Two Functions



On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:35:14 -0500, quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:23:02 GMT, John Schutkeker
<jschutkeker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


If I define u1(r1,r2)=(1/r1)+(1/r2) and u2(r1,r2)=1/(r2-r1). How would I
go about solving these two equations for r1(u1,u2) and r2(u1,u2), which
would constitute "inverting the functions"? Thanks In Advance!

Elementary algebra! Try it before giving up.

Write down 2 equations:

u1 = (1/r1)+(1/r2)

u2 = 1/(r2-r1)

Viewing r1,r2 as the unknowns, you have 2 equations in 2 unknowns.

How hard can it be?

Of course, there are always tricks, but before looking for tricks, how
about trying the most basic method (from elementary algebra):

Choose one equation and solve that equation for one of the unknowns in
terms of the other. Then use the result as a replacement for that
unknown in the other equation, thus yielding one equation in one
unknown. You should be able to figure out the rest.

You try it.

Also, for a function to be invertible, it has to be one-to-one. But as
you'll see when you solve algebraically, your function is mostly
two-to-one (on R^2).

quasi
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: How Do I Invert These Two Functions
    ... Elementary algebra! ... Viewing r1,r2 as the unknowns, you have 2 equations in 2 unknowns. ... about trying the most basic method (from elementary algebra): ... You are not inverting _two_ functions. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Key in the lock, factoring technique
    ... technique to factor, which is a key in the lock technique, where the ... showing complete contempt for your knowledge of basic algebra: ... in 4 unknowns. ... Even the US could go up in financial flames. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Accepting Jebus Chrisp on the points of toast
    ... "elementary algebra" is? ... Please take all the lines you need you innumerate fool. ... It has had nothing to do with their Shoah mythology. ...
    (soc.history.ancient)
  • Re: better than a quartic?
    ... For typing convenience I've relabelled your variables and unknowns ... The latter pair are equivalent to: ... the following general parametrization of u, ... to check the algebra! ...
    (sci.math.num-analysis)
  • Re: better than a quartic?
    ... For typing convenience I've relabelled your variables and unknowns ... The latter pair are equivalent to: ... the following general parametrization of u, ... to check the algebra! ...
    (sci.math)