Re: x^y + y^x > 1

In article <Virgil-00D9BB.23513229112007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Virgil <Virgil@xxxxxxx> wrote:

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
In article
<aderamey.addw-A974F6.20550629112007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
The World Wide Wade <aderamey.addw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <Virgil-73A6EF.20312829112007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Virgil <Virgil@xxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <Xns99F7D79305DE0goddardbenetscapenet@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Bart Goddard <goddardbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Virgil <Virgil@xxxxxxx> wrote in news:Virgil-1AFBE5.19462229112007
@comcast.dca.giganews.com:

Not for x = y = -3.

-3 is very small for a positive number.

There is nothing in the subject header about anything being positive.

Come on. It's specified in the OP's post.

Which was not included in the posting I saw, since MT_Newswatcher does
not display the entire thread, nor allow easy access to it.

I use MT Newswatcher and it's fine.

Anything prior to the line of colons I entered above for this posting
did not appear on my screen.
.