Re: The infintely small number b
- From: G. Frege <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:26:18 +0100
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:17:06 -0800, Michael Press <rubrum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Wow! So Jaynes actually _solved_ Zeno's Paradox? Didn't know that!!!
[...]
However this may be my overly-practical, engineering-
trained side speaking, and this view may not be shared
by real mathematicians.
Limits are a false trail. Zeno deliberately confuses a
mathematical object with a physical object. Separate
the mathematical realm from the realm of natural
philosophy and the confusion disappears into the blue
sky. Jaynes calls it the mind projection fallacy.
Great news! Is this a generally known (and accepted) result? :-o
;-)
F.
--
E-mail: info<at>simple-line<dot>de
.
- References:
- Re: The infintely small number b
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Re: The infintely small number b
- From: Marshall
- Re: The infintely small number b
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Re: The infintely small number b
- From: Marshall
- Re: The infintely small number b
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The infintely small number b
- From: Marshall
- Re: The infintely small number b
- From: Michael Press
- Re: The infintely small number b
- Prev by Date: Re: Solving an integral that can't be solved by Mathematica, Mathcad or TI calc
- Next by Date: Re: Non-zero gaps between real numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: The infintely small number b
- Next by thread: Re: The infintely small number b
- Index(es):