Re: A flaw with Venkat Reddy's arithmetic.
- From: Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 09:37:15 +0100
Marshall wrote:
Frankly I'm really pissed off at the real numbers and how hard
they are to do calculations with.
As to what they mean, the answer a lot of people run with
is that they mean an interval or a range of numbers. But I
find that the model of them as being precise values with
imprecise operators (approximations) is a better description.
For the interested:
http://repository.readscheme.org/ftp/papers/sw2004/egner.pdf
In another poster you wrote, when I asked you for ever having solved a
_real_ problem:
Well, I have code in systems that handle billions of dollars
in transactions a year. So, yeah.
Most experience I have with floating point numbers is in the context of
_technical_ applications. With administrative applications (: finance),
I'm relying on integer numbers, no floats. So I don't understand quite
well your frustrations about floating point numbers with dollars.
Han de Bruijn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A flaw with Venkat Reddy's arithmetic.
- From: Marshall
- Re: A flaw with Venkat Reddy's arithmetic.
- Prev by Date: Re: Closure of unit ball in L^1 in different topologies
- Next by Date: Re: Comparison, equality, subtraction
- Previous by thread: Electrons and Spin(n)
- Next by thread: Re: A flaw with Venkat Reddy's arithmetic.
- Index(es):