Re: The Law of the Excluded Middle again (long)
- From: Keith Ramsay <kramsay@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 00:33:16 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 1, 11:38 am, Angus Rodgers <twir...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|A recent thread asked for a "slick" proof that x^y + y^x > 1
|for all positive real numbers x and y; and a reference was
|given to a proof of this by Wade Ramey in sci.math in 2003.
You proved this by cases, by proving it on various subsets
S1,...,Sn of S = {(x,y) : x,y>0}. It's true that the claim
that S1,...,Sn cover S is nonconstructive. However, the set
of points where it holds is an open region, and S is the
only open region in S that contains all the S1,...,Sn
(constructively). It's a dense union of closed sets (closed
relative to S). So the argument doesn't really need much of
a change to make it constructive.
Keith Ramsay
.
- References:
- The Law of the Excluded Middle again (long)
- From: Angus Rodgers
- The Law of the Excluded Middle again (long)
- Prev by Date: Re: Generators, groups order lower bound
- Next by Date: Re: Closure of unit ball in L^1 in different topologies
- Previous by thread: Re: The Law of the Excluded Middle again (long)
- Next by thread: Re: The Law of the Excluded Middle again (long)
- Index(es):