Re: Is there a formlisation of Euclidean geometry?
- From: Randy Poe <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 12:19:15 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 3, 3:11 pm, Dan Piponi <dpip...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What I mean is this: Is there a formalisation into which we can embed
Euclid's Elements (or at least a non-trivial part of it) in such a way
that the proofs could be checked by machine? It could be done in an
uninteresting way simply by using R^2 as a model of the plane and
using the axioms of ZF. But is there a formal axiomatisation that is
close to what Euclid attempted? Obviously Euclid thought he had
achieved this goal, but it's not clear at all you can really reduce
his proofs to deductions from just his five axioms.
Hilbert's axiomization is probably the most famous,
but not the only formalization of Euclidean geometry.
http://www.math.umbc.edu/~campbell/Math306Spr02/Axioms/Hilbert.html
- Randy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there a formlisation of Euclidean geometry?
- From: Dan Piponi
- Re: Is there a formlisation of Euclidean geometry?
- References:
- Is there a formlisation of Euclidean geometry?
- From: Dan Piponi
- Is there a formlisation of Euclidean geometry?
- Prev by Date: Re: The Law of the Excluded Middle again (long)
- Next by Date: Proving that two sequences are asymtotic
- Previous by thread: Is there a formlisation of Euclidean geometry?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there a formlisation of Euclidean geometry?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|