Re: The Law of the Excluded Middle again (long)

On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:18:17 -0500, quasi
<quasi@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

The fact is, as I see it, you don't really want to be brief.
You are quite proud of your stream-of-consciousness ramblings.

You are, of course, welcome to your opinion. For my part, I
don't have any opinion as to what you are getting out of this.
You puzzle me. But it's not a puzzle I'm minded to solve.

I have no objection to /ad hominem/ remarks, in general, so long
as they provide some enlightening interpretation, which might cut
short some meaningless drivel (such as I surely must indulge in
here from time to time). But merely telling someone that they are
"proud" or "narcissistic", that they should either "stop talking"
or "have fun" (in a snide manner), or that they have "merely come
to argue", enlightens no-one, and qualifies as little better than
a petty insult.

/Ad hominem/ attacks apart, you have told me nothing I don't know,
and your arguments are not worth dignifying with an answer. If I
annoy you as much as I seem to do, I suggest you killfile me.
--
Angus Rodgers
(twirlip@ eats spam; reply to angusrod@)
Contains mild peril
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: last column address
    ... puzzle (your data layout) before getting chance to answer it. ... opinion, then next time I'll skip such posts! ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.misc)
  • Re: The Law of the Excluded Middle again (long)
    ... You are quite proud of your stream-of-consciousness ramblings. ... You are, of course, welcome to your opinion. ... It's suppose to alert you to the fact that your intended math points ... When I want to hurt, I use the truth -- that hurts the most. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: number puzzle
    ... relish difficult logic problems ... ... This puzzle is crap ... ... then your opinion of what is good is also ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: number puzzle
    ... relish difficult logic problems ... ... This puzzle is crap ... ... then your opinion of what is good is also ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)