Re: Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- From: Helmut Richter <hhr-m@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 16:58:11 +0100
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, fc wrote:
For example, what calculus was made to arrive that a decimal number of
617 digits must have 2048 digits in binary? (Obviously, without make
the conversion of the decimal number 999999...99999 [617 9 numbers] to
binary) And: how to generalize for any decimal number of any length?
The number of digits of x in some base b is, not regarding rounding to
integers, the logarithm of x with respect to base b, which is log x / log
b (log to arbitrary base).
So the number of decimal digits of x is log 2 / log 10 = 0.30103 .
--
Helmut Richter
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- From: Helmut Richter
- Re: Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- From: Jeremy Boden
- Re: Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Existence of reals and observation of them
- Next by Date: Re: Non-zero gaps between real numbers
- Previous by thread: Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- Next by thread: Re: Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|