Re: Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- From: Adam <no@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 17:21:31 -0500
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:44:00 -0500, Adam wrote:
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 07:39:24 -0800 (PST), fc wrote:
And: how to generalize for any decimal number of any length?
Consider the following two 5-digit decimal numbers:
expression decimal number bits required
2^16 - 1 65,535 16
2^16 + 2^14 81,920 17
5 * log(10) / log(2) = 16.6
Round up or down comes into play again.
It's even messier than that:
expression decimal number bits required
none 10,000 14
2^14 16,384 15
2^15 32,768 16
2^16 + 2^14 81,920 17
Adam
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- From: mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- References:
- Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- From: fc
- Re: Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- From: Helmut Richter
- Re: Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- From: Jeremy Boden
- Re: Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- From: mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- From: Adam
- Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- Prev by Date: Re: Factorising this...
- Next by Date: Re: Coverge or diverge
- Previous by thread: Re: Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- Next by thread: Re: Binary number digits <- > Decimal number digits
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|