Re: Multiple infinities - one more look
- From: Marshall <marshall.spight@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 19:29:33 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 9, 7:17 pm, Venkat Reddy <vred...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 9, 10:48 pm, Denis Feldmann <denis.feldmann.asuppri...@club-
internet.fr> wrote:
Dave Seaman a écrit :
I'm not sure if the infinte sums and series obey the fundamental
theorem of arithmetic.
The fundamental theorem of arithmetic applies to integers. Each integer
has a unique factorization into primes. A number of the form 2^k does
not have 3 as a factor.
At this stage, you should
1) stop feeding the troll
Rather, I'm feeding you to be able to question the flaws irrespective
of which giant personalities and how many tones of literature
supporting flaw.
While you are supposed to investigate, correct and expand the
knowledge, you are afraid to question, unable to question, and think
there is nothing remaining to be questioned here, while we do not know
almost anything at all.
The quesion I asked is if the fundamental theorem of arithmetic
applies to all integers, then why do we use the results of the
infinite sums that defeates the theorem? Then you choose to say that
the sum is not really a sum but something else, and remainder is not
really zero but can be taken as zero etc. You can't hide behind these
excuses and imprecise notions any longer.
See, it's when you say jaw-droppingly arrogant stuff like this
that you get mistaken for a troll. Of course you are not a troll.
You are a crank: someone whose mental processes are
broken in a small but deeply fundamental way.
Marshall
.
- References:
- Multiple infinities - one more look
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Re: Multiple infinities - one more look
- From: FredJeffries@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Multiple infinities - one more look
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Re: Multiple infinities - one more look
- From: Mike Terry
- Re: Multiple infinities - one more look
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Re: Multiple infinities - one more look
- From: mike3
- Re: Multiple infinities - one more look
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Re: Multiple infinities - one more look
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Multiple infinities - one more look
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Re: Multiple infinities - one more look
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Re: Multiple infinities - one more look
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Multiple infinities - one more look
- From: Denis Feldmann
- Re: Multiple infinities - one more look
- From: Venkat Reddy
- Multiple infinities - one more look
- Prev by Date: Re: Group Theory and RZH relationship
- Next by Date: Re: Existence of reals and observation of them
- Previous by thread: Re: Multiple infinities - one more look
- Next by thread: Re: Multiple infinities - one more look
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|