Re: Proof that A^n = 0 if A is nilpotent



In article
<abe5b6f5-eee7-48b9-939d-aae7a846dbe7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
roups.com>,
vip.maverick@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Hi ,

I would like to request some help if anyone has ideas about how to
prove that if A is nilpotent matrix then A^n = 0?

Take the dimension of A to be n.
Suppose s is the least s such that A^s = 0
Take u =/= 0 in R^n.
There is a least integer k <= n such that
A^0.u, A^1.u, A^2.u, ..., A^k.u are linearly dependent.
That is to say there is a polynomial P of degree k <= n
such that P(A) = 0. Therefore P(X) divides X^s, and P(X) = X^k.
Therefore s <= n, and A^n = 0.

--
Michael Press
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: B Results on Saturday
    ... Michael Press wrote: ... the 5 day period where Landis could make a request. ... The UCI might have ... do the test with or without Landis' request if they want to. ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • Re: Factoraization of n! as power of primes
    ... another request can anyone tell me about that prize given to the mathematician who's below 40 years old? ... (meaning p^k divides n! ... This is shown, for example, in "Concrete Mathematics" by Graham and al, section 4.4. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Proof that A^n = 0 if A is nilpotent
    ... I would like to request some help if anyone has ideas about how to ... prove that if A is nilpotent matrix then A^n = 0? ... --- Christopher Heckman ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: proove that n^4 + n is never prime
    ... DanKage wrote: ... > But I have one last request. ... If you need to proove that a certain ... > number divides an expression involving n, for all n, what is the usual ...
    (sci.math)

Quantcast