Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair
- From: MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:02:20 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 17, 11:21 am, Hero <Hero.van.Jind...@xxxxxx> wrote:
for me the books didn't
convince me
From your seeming unfamiliarity with some of the basic concepts, Ifind it difficult to believe you've grasped such developments as
presented in, for example, Suppes's text.
The question remaining, can set theory and especially Kuratowski's
definition give an ordered pair?
There is no question of that kind remaining. The Kuratowski definition
in the language of set theory suffices to capture the needed
mathematical features of the notion of an ordered pair.
MoeBlee
.
- References:
- Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair
- From: Hero
- Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair
- From: Hero
- Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair
- From: noel etters
- Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair
- From: Hero
- Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair
- From: Hero
- Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair
- From: Hero
- Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair
- From: Hero
- Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair
- From: Hero
- Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair
- Prev by Date: Re: Tetration again!
- Next by Date: Re: What big scientific changes will ...
- Previous by thread: Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair
- Next by thread: Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair
- Index(es):