Re: Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule
- From: Maya <maya_souj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:58:42 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 21, 1:02 pm, "FredJeffr...@xxxxxxxxx" <FredJeffr...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Dec 21, 11:39 am, Maya <maya_s...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At the bottom of the intro to the Wikipedia entry on the 68-95-99.7
rule, it states:
"This rule is often used to quickly get a rough estimate of
something's probability, given its standard deviation."
What an awful sentence.
What " thing's " probability could I estimate, given the thing's
standard deviation? Let's say I have this data set: {6, 6, 8, 8} .
It's standard deviation is 1. So, given its "1", I can estiate the
probability of ..... what?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/68-95-99.7_rule
You also need the mean, in the case of your data set 7. So the
68-95-99.7 rule says that about 68% of observations will be within 1
of 7 (between 6 and 8), 95% within 2 of 7 (between 5 and 9) and 99.7%
within 3 of 7 (between 4 and 10) IF your data set were distributed
normally.
Say you have a normally distributed data set with mean 7 and standard
deviation 1. Pick an element at random from your set. The probability
of that element's being between 6 and 8 is 68%, the probability of its
being between 5 and 9 is 95%, etc.
There is a better example at the bottom of this page:http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~naras/jsm/NormalDensity/NormalDensity.html
Thanks Fred.
This stuff seems to be going in a circle. The Empirical Rule applies
only to Normal Distributions. So I can ascertain some things about the
data points in a normal distribution by applying the empirical rule,
but I should only apply the empirical rule if I'm first sure that the
data set is a normal distribution!
I'm trying to find a real-world use for Standard Deviation and the
Empirical Rule, but so far it seems the only uses are to tell me
things about a data set if and only if I already know those very
things about the data set are already true.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule
- From: Maya
- Re: Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule
- References:
- Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule
- From: Maya
- Re: Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule
- From: FredJeffries@xxxxxxxxx
- Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule
- Prev by Date: Re: they mention various metaphors and ramble about various concerns (Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair)
- Next by Date: Re: Venkat!
- Previous by thread: Re: Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule
- Next by thread: Re: Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|