Re: Random numbers
- From: Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Dec 2007 00:19:19 +0200
Marshall <marshall.spight@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
So when you start telling him that his solution is biased,
he's over there saying whatever the British equivalent
of "duh" is. Some kind of metric "duh" I imagine. Or
maybe they're standardizing on a Euroduh. Although I
suppose if they did that the U.K. wouldn't adopt it, at
least not right away.
Here in Finland, we use the Euroduh. We would spell it
phonetically, but don't have the letters for that, alas.
The closest we can get would probably sound a bit like
either Swedish or puking, assuming there's actually a
difference between the two.
/jööroudah/, bork, bork, bork, retch.
Phil
--
Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all.
-- Microsoft voice recognition live demonstration
.
- References:
- Random numbers
- From: John
- Re: Random numbers
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Random numbers
- From: quasi
- Re: Random numbers
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Random numbers
- From: quasi
- Re: Random numbers
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Random numbers
- From: quasi
- Re: Random numbers
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Random numbers
- From: quasi
- Re: Random numbers
- From: Marshall
- Random numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule
- Next by Date: Re: Random numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: Random numbers
- Next by thread: Re: Random numbers
- Index(es):