# Re: Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule

*From*: Virgil <Virgil@xxxxxxx>*Date*: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:33:08 -0700

In article

<df2a13da-cc2c-4f60-bf93-5be6e9b8ad2e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,

Maya <maya_souj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Among other things, this sort of information is used in statistical

hypothesis testing, q.v.

IN what way? What would be a simple example of the good of knowing

only the SD without knowing which type of distribution the data set is?

Knowing the SD alone is not likely to be useful, but knowing both the

mean and SD can be.

As explanations of how they are useful tend to be long and involved,

perhaps you should find an elementary statistics text from which to get

a thorough explanation.

.

**References**:**Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule***From:*Maya

**Re: Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule***From:*FredJeffries@xxxxxxxxx

**Re: Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule***From:*Maya

**Re: Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule***From:*Maya

**Re: Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule***From:*Virgil

**Re: Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule***From:*Maya

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Real numbers , what are they good for ?** - Next by Date:
**Re: Real numbers , what are they good for ?** - Previous by thread:
**Re: Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule** - Next by thread:
**Re: Standard Deviation & the 68-95-99.7 rule** - Index(es):