Re: Random numbers

On Dec 22, 11:35 pm, quasi <qu...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 10:32:37 -0800 (PST), vr <simple.pop...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:





On Dec 22, 11:16 pm, quasi <qu...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:57:00 -0800 (PST), simple.pop...@xxxxxxxxx
wrote:

On Dec 21, 11:37 pm, bill <b92...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 21, 3:16 am, John <iamach...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Given a function that returns a random number between 1-5, write one
that returns a random number between 1-7 for the case when it should
be integer and for the case it can be real.

Let S be the function that generates a RN between 1 and 5.  Then

T =  S_1 + S_2 + ... + S_7

For the reals , RN_7 = T/7

May be this should fix it:

For the reals , RN_7 = 1 + (T-7)*3/14

Yes, that fixes the range.

But it's still biased (that is, not a unform distribution).

quasi- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hmm. Let me simplify it:

RN_7 = T*3/14 - 0.5

If you look at T*3/14, it just scales the sum of random numbers
uniformly using a constant multiplier. Did I miss to notice any non-
uniformity here?

Yes, T is not uniformly distributed in its range.

Ok. But if S_n is guaranted to be uniformly distributed in the range 1
to 5, then doesn't it mean the sum of 7 such numbers will also get
distributed over 7 to 35? I'm just curious. Thanks.
.

Quantcast